Wall Street: Market Repricing & AI Analysis

This Week’s Focus: Repricing the AI Trade

Global equity markets have opened and also ended the week on softer footing as investors reassessed how much of the AI-driven rally is already embedded in stock valuations, especially in tech shares. Early in the week, a sharp shift in U.S. interest rate expectations set the tone: traders now see a relatively higher probability that the Federal Reserve (Fed) keeps policy unchanged, compared with near-certainty of a cut only a month ago. The repricing also weighed on European equities and contributed to more uneven leadership within U.S. tech, where the once-uniform AI momentum has begun to fragment.

Asia-Pacific markets were more mixed, while renewed geopolitical tensions, including Beijing’s latest travel advisory affecting Japan, added another layer of caution. Even AI darling Nvidia’s (NVDA) stronger-than-expected earnings, which briefly eased bubble concerns, did not fully offset unease around valuation sensitivity or the narrow concentration driving index-level returns.

Fund manager surveys reinforce this tension. Cash levels among investors have fallen to a “sell-signal” threshold. Yet 63% of global managers consider equities overvalued, and nearly half cite an AI bubble as the top tail risk. As a result, the central question is shifting from how fast AI demand can grow to how much of that growth is already priced in. And for analysts, this environment complicates real-time interpretation: filings, transcripts and market behavior move on different timelines.

When AI Fills the Gaps

When market data and behavior no longer fully align, users of large language models (LLMs) may begin to note that LLMs could give answers that sound plausible but have no verifiable source. In other words, AI hallucinations are most likely to appear, often as confident claims about revenue trends that never happened or guidance drawn from the wrong period.

A quick illustration demonstrates the shift in the model’s behavior:

Standard prompt: “Analyze why [TICKER] declined 15% this month.”

Typical output: The model may produce a fluent narrative connecting recent earnings, specific margin trends and guidance adjustments; details that sound authoritative but may not appear in any filing.

Improved prompt:
“Using only the latest quarterly filing for [COMPANY] and verifiable market data for the month of [MONTH YEAR], explain factors that may have contributed to [TICKER]’s recent move. If information is missing, state that explicitly.”

Typical output: The model better describes valuation compression, sector rotation or rate sensitivity using confirmed figures, and notes where earnings data doesn't address the question.

The difference is simple: the second prompt forces the model to acknowledge the limits of the available data rather than filling gaps with statistically likely but unverifiable detail. To build prompts that consistently produce this kind of grounded output, three elements work especially well:

• A precise timestamp: Direct the model to use data strictly from the latest quarterly or annual filing. This prevents blending across periods and keeps the analysis anchored.

• Publicly verifiable information only: Restrict the model to filings, transcripts, official guidance, and observable market behavior. This narrows the scope to facts an analyst can check.

• Clear refusal rules: Instruct the model to state explicitly when data is missing instead of generating an answer that approximates what “should” be there.

This approach can produce more concise or less fluid responses, and help avoid hallucinations. Such context and constraints within the prompt provide the structure required to keep outputs accurate, transparent and better aligned with correct information.

Two AI Prompts for Volatility on Wall Street

Below are two prompts designed for this volatile investment environment. They combine clarity (role, task and sequence) with constraints (verified data only, refusal rules, references). This is the structure that keeps an LLM grounded when markets move fast and volatility increases.

📌 Prompt Example 1: Stock Analysis Anchored to Recent Conditions

This prompt forces the model to reference filings, interpret observable price behavior and avoid fabricated detail.

📌 Prompt Example 2: Compare Competitive Positioning  

Peer anchoring keeps the model focused on discrete, comparable numbers.

How We Can Support Your Business 

We're a small team of investment professionals behind this newsletter focused on research, analysis and AI tools for finance. Drawing from decades of experience at funds, corporates and investment writing agencies in the U.S., U.K. and continental Europe, here's how we can support your business further:

• AI Prompting Training for Investment Professionals: We offer live, in-person or online, global learning & development sessions on AI prompting for investment research, analysis and writing.

• Investment Writing Services: Need high-quality content? We create fund commentary, investor letters, white papers and more, tailored to your voice and audience.

• Feature Your Business: Showcase your company, products or services to our audience of investment professionals and retail investors.

• LLM Training in the U.S., U.K. and Europe: Training the next-generation LLMs? We currently provide subject-matter consulting services to California-based LLMs (under NDA).

& Ways You Can Support Independent Research

• Click Our Sponsor Links: Each click from our sponsors helps fund our research. (Yes, even one click matters.)

• Share with your colleagues: If you like the content, please share it with your colleagues on social media platforms or at work.

• Support Our Work: Value our insights? You can contribute and support us with a coffee here: https://ko-fi.com/investingprompts  

• For collaborations, training or writing services: [email protected] 

Final Note

Structured prompts are one tool among many for working with AI models in finance and investment research. Their value increases when the gap between available data and analytical questions widens, which tends to happen during periods of rapid volatility and repricing.

Thank you for reading AI in Investment Research & Finance. Here’s to spotting tomorrow’s market stories today.

Until next time!